“Smash or Pass” is a viral internet game that has become a staple in online communities, especially across social media platforms. The concept is simple: participants are presented with images of individuals—often celebrities, fictional characters, or even people from their own social circles—and must decide in an instant whether they’d “smash” (express attraction or interest) or “pass” (reject or find them unappealing). While the game seems harmless and fun on the surface, its widespread popularity raises questions about how we engage with one another, what we value in others, and how we view ourselves in a society obsessed with appearance.
At first glance, “Smash or Pass” appears to be an innocent activity—a way to have fun with friends, joke about celebrity crushes, or casually evaluate characters from pop culture. The simplicity of the game, which boils down to making a snap decision about someone’s attractiveness, fits well with the rapid-fire nature of the internet, where people often prefer quick, easy interactions. It’s also a way to engage in discussions about physical attraction and even poke fun at the over-the-top personas created by the media. For some, the game is no more than a lighthearted distraction or a humorous way to engage with social media content.
However, as with many online smash or pass trends, the implications of “Smash or Pass” run deeper than they may seem. The game’s focus on physical appearance can reduce individuals to mere objects of attraction, ignoring the complexity and richness that makes them who they are. In a world where first impressions are often based on looks, “Smash or Pass” emphasizes the idea that a person’s value is determined by their physical features alone. While it might seem like harmless fun, this mindset can reinforce harmful societal beauty standards that prioritize certain body types, features, and ethnic backgrounds while marginalizing others. It’s a reminder of how heavily the media and internet culture place emphasis on physicality rather than qualities like intelligence, kindness, or emotional intelligence.
Moreover, “Smash or Pass” can contribute to an unhealthy culture of comparison. By presenting people with binary choices—either “smash” or “pass”—it creates a scenario where one’s worth is determined by how they measure up to someone else’s preferences. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy, especially for those who may not fit the narrow standards of beauty that dominate online spaces. The quick judgment inherent in the game fosters an environment where external features are seen as the most important trait, often leaving other valuable aspects of a person’s character overlooked.
In addition, the game can foster a toxic environment, particularly when it comes to public forums or social media platforms. People may use “Smash or Pass” as a vehicle for cruel humor or body shaming. The anonymity of online spaces can sometimes fuel harmful comments and make individuals feel vulnerable. People who are publicly “passed” or mocked based on their appearance may experience negative effects on their self-esteem, contributing to a broader culture of exclusion and body negativity. This kind of judgment can feel particularly isolating for those already struggling with body image issues or feelings of self-doubt.
Despite its potential negative impact, the game can also be seen in a more benign light, especially in private settings or within fan communities. For instance, fans of a particular TV show, movie, or celebrity may use “Smash or Pass” as a way to engage in playful debates over fictional characters or popular figures. In these cases, the game isn’t necessarily about judging real people but rather about enjoying a lighthearted conversation about the allure of a character or persona. When used in this context, the game can serve as a fun way to bond with others over shared interests without the harmful effects associated with judging real-life individuals.
The key to enjoying “Smash or Pass” without falling into harmful territory lies in the context and the intention behind it. In private spaces, where participants are comfortable and consent to the game, it can remain a playful, harmless activity. However, in public or online settings, the game’s implications grow more complex. It serves as a reminder of the power of quick judgments and the importance of considering the broader consequences of the messages we send about beauty, attraction, and self-worth. As online culture continues to evolve, it’s essential to be mindful of how these trends shape the way we perceive others and ourselves.